Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Go to network54.com
Network54 Sponsor
create browse search login help  
  Network54  >>  Group 1 - Mandatory Corporate Drug Testing

Group 1 - Mandatory Corporate Drug Testing

Instructions: Discuss your views, opinions, and supporting arguments on the issue of mandatory corporate drug testing. Support your comments with your experiences, values and supporting arguments from readings and research. Post at least three messages to your group discussion each week (from Tuesday to following Tuesday), and try to reply to other's comments and questions. After you've discussed a range of viewpoints, compare, contrast & evaluate views and arguments to establish a common ground & understanding.

Click here to read about the different ways you can contribute to a group discussion. For other help, email Allan Jeong.


Post new message thread!View all messages
  1. In favor of corporate drug testing. Alexander Ehrnrooth, Nov 14, 2000, 8:06 PM
    1. In favor. Jeff Hodgdon, Nov 17, 2000, 1:43 PM
      1. So, we all agree?. Jorge Echenique, Nov 19, 2000, 6:09 PM
  2. The opposition speaks.... James Kulp, Nov 19, 2000, 7:52 PM
    1. Disagree. , Nov 19, 2000, 8:28 PM
      1. I agree with Alfredo. Alexander Ehrnrooth, Nov 19, 2000, 9:57 PM
      2. Drug testing is NOT a right. James Kulp, Nov 20, 2000, 6:11 PM
        1. Some questions..... Jorge Echenique, Nov 20, 2000, 6:30 PM
          1. What would you do?. James Kulp, Nov 22, 2000, 4:30 PM
            1. OK, this is my answer.... Jorge Echenique, Nov 23, 2000, 5:45 PM
            2. Yes, I'd Care!. Jeff Hodgdon, Nov 26, 2000, 8:28 PM
    2. Agree. Dinesh Chandran, Nov 22, 2000, 12:22 AM
    3. agree with james. , Nov 25, 2000, 1:20 PM
      1. Some good points. Jeff Hodgdon, Nov 26, 2000, 8:34 PM
      2. Alcohol as a drug. Alexander Ehrnrooth, Nov 27, 2000, 12:01 PM
  3. Let Us Vote for who is an favor and who is not. Alexander Ehrnrooth, Nov 20, 2000, 11:33 AM
    1. 1 Vote For Drugtesting. Alexander Ehrnrooth, Nov 20, 2000, 11:35 AM
    2. I'm beginning to feel like Nader.. James Kulp, Nov 20, 2000, 6:14 PM
      1. In favor of Drug Testing. Jeff Hodgdon, Nov 26, 2000, 8:47 PM
    3. Second vote for drug testing. , Nov 21, 2000, 7:47 PM
    4. I am against drug testing. Dinesh Chandran, Nov 22, 2000, 12:25 AM
    5. against drug testing. , Nov 25, 2000, 1:09 PM
  4. 2 Threads / test prior to Hire vs. aftrer hire. Jeff Hodgdon, Nov 26, 2000, 8:42 PM
    1. Untitled. Kitt Rasmussen, Nov 27, 2000, 5:30 PM
    2. no drug testing at all, before or after hire. , Nov 30, 2000, 12:05 PM
  5. Some additional issues. James Kulp, Nov 27, 2000, 5:41 PM
    1. Agree with James. Kitt, Nov 27, 2000, 7:17 PM
    2. No, No, No!!. , Nov 27, 2000, 10:46 PM
      1. How do you decide whats illegal?. Dinesh Chandran, Nov 27, 2000, 11:13 PM
        1. taking drugs is illegal. , Nov 28, 2000, 10:54 PM
          1. Where do you stop?. Dinesh Chandran, Dec 1, 2000, 8:08 PM
      2. What problem are corporations really trying to solve?. , Nov 29, 2000, 11:08 PM
    3. agree. , Nov 30, 2000, 12:10 PM
    4. Untitled. Jeff Hodgdon, Dec 3, 2000, 10:55 PM
  6. Compromise??. James Kulp, Nov 29, 2000, 5:13 PM
    1. Second thougts..... Jorge Echenique, Nov 30, 2000, 12:16 PM
    2. probably no compromises ever. , Nov 30, 2000, 12:17 PM
      1. You give up easily. , Dec 3, 2000, 5:42 PM
    3. Solid ideas. , Nov 30, 2000, 2:10 PM
      1. My attempt at a compromise. James Kulp, Dec 3, 2000, 2:36 PM
        1. Excellent Points. Jeff Hodgdon, Dec 3, 2000, 11:11 PM
        2. Good. , Dec 5, 2000, 12:36 AM
        3. Untitled. Ronta Belle, Dec 5, 2000, 10:05 AM
        4. I disagree to point1. Dinesh Chandran, Dec 7, 2000, 11:16 AM
      2. I am amazed how you defend the Corporation. , Dec 3, 2000, 5:47 PM
        1. Untitled. Jeff Hodgdon, Dec 3, 2000, 11:04 PM
          1. Would you like to be testet?. Kitt, Dec 4, 2000, 5:27 PM
            1. Untitled. Jeff Hodgdon, Dec 4, 2000, 11:29 PM
    4. Suggestion for compromise. Alexander Ehrnrooth, Nov 30, 2000, 5:42 PM
    5. Untitled. Dinesh Chandran, Dec 1, 2000, 8:03 PM
  7. Suggestions for clearification of standpoints. , Dec 3, 2000, 6:05 PM
    1. good summary of issues. James Kulp, Dec 4, 2000, 8:49 PM
      1. I agree with James. Jore Echenique, Dec 5, 2000, 12:05 PM
        1. Lets reach a compromise based on James ideas. , Dec 5, 2000, 10:18 PM
  8. Drugs and Workplace - A Real Life "Case". Jeff Hodgdon, Dec 4, 2000, 11:40 PM
    1. Give him a second chance!. Kitt, Dec 5, 2000, 12:36 AM
    2. Untitled. Ronta Belle, Dec 5, 2000, 1:45 AM
    3. Give him a second chance. Dinesh Chandran, Dec 7, 2000, 11:09 AM
      1. How would this affect YOU?. Jeff Hodgdon, Dec 7, 2000, 5:38 PM
        1. I would be cautious. Dinesh Chandran, Dec 10, 2000, 2:26 PM
    4. Untitled. Ronta Belle, Dec 12, 2000, 7:38 AM


Hide Header
 Copyright 2000 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement